In the last post we used Python code to take a look at a classic gambling situation, the coin flip, to make a point about the importance of choosing the highest odds available to bet at. Today, we’ll again use the coin flipping example to investigate another fundamental principal of successful gambling: stake sizing.

Now, imagine we’re one of the lucky punters from the last post who were allowed to bet on a fair coin flip at odds of 2.03. As I stated then, this is pretty much like a license to print money – but how much of your bankroll should you bet on each flip of the coin? Knowing that the coin was indeed fair and you would be getting the best of it, a natural instinct could be to bet as much as you could possibly cough up, steal and borrow in order to maximize your profit. This is a poor strategy though, as we’ll soon come to see.

The reason for this is that even if we do have come across a profitable proposition, our edge when betting at a (I’ll empasize it again: *fair*) coin flip at 2.03 odds is only 1.5% – meaning that for each 1 unit bet we are expected to net 0.015 units on average. This conclusion should be absolute basics for anyone interested in serious gambling, but to make sure we’re all on the same page I’ll throw some maths at you:

The** Expected Value**, or **EV**, of any bet is, simply put, the sum of all outcomes multiplied by their respective probabilities – indicating the punter’s *average *profit or loss on each bet. So with our coin flip, we’ll win a net of 1.03 units 50% of the time and lose 1 unit 50% of the time; our EV is therefore 1.03 * 0.5 + (-1 * 0.5) = 0.015, for a positive edge of 1.5% and an average profit of 0.015 units per bet. For these simple types of bets though, an easier way to calculate EV is to divide the given odds by the true odds and subtract 1: 2.03 / 2.0 – 1 = 0.015.

An edge of only 1.5% is nothing to scoff at though, empires has been built on less, so we’ll definitely want to bet something – but how much?

Stake sizing is much down to personal preferences about risk aversion and tolerance of the variance innately involved in gambling, but with some Python code we can at least have a look at some different strategies before we set out to chase riches and glory flipping coins. Just like in the last post I’ll just give you the code with some comments in it, which will hopefully guide you along what’s happening before I briefly explain it.

Here we go:

import numpy as np import pandas as pd import matplotlib.pyplot as plt import seaborn as sns def coin_flips(n=10000,odds=1.97,bankroll=100,stake=1,bankrupt=False): ''' Simulates 10000 coinflips for a single punter, betting at 1.97 odds, also calculates net winnings NEW: default bankroll and stake set at 100 and 1, respectively now also calculates if player went bankrupt or not ''' # create a pandas dataframe for storing coin flip results # and calculate net winnings df = pd.DataFrame() # insert n number of coinflips, 0=loss, 1=win df['result'] = np.random.randint(2,size=n) # calculate net winnings df['net'] = np.where(df['result']==1,stake*odds-stake,-stake) # calculate cumulative net winnings df['cum_net'] = df['net'].cumsum() # calculate total bankroll df['bankroll'] = df['cum_net'] + bankroll # if bankroll goes below the default stake, punter will stop betting # count times bankroll < stake df['bankrupt'] = np.where(df['bankroll']<stake,1,0) # count cumulative bankruptcies, with column shifted one step down df['bankruptcies'] = df['bankrupt'].cumsum().shift(1) # in case first flip is a loss, bankruptcies will be NaN, replace with 0 df.fillna(0,inplace=True) # drop all flips after first bankruptcy if bankrupt: df = df[df['bankruptcies']==0] return df

First off, we’ll modify our original **coin_flips** function to take our punter’s bankroll and stake size into consideration, setting the bankrupt threshold at the point where a default sized bet can no longer be made. By default, our punter will have an endless stream of 100 unit bankrolls, but if we set the parameter **bankrupt** to True, the function will cut away any coin flips after his first bankruptcy.

def many_coin_flips(punters=100,n=10000,odds=1.97,bankroll=100,stake=1,color='r',plot=False,bankrupt=False): ''' Simulates 10000 coinflips for 100 different punters, all betting at 1.97 odds, also calculates and plots net winnings for each punter NEW: now also saves punter bankruptcies ''' # create pandas dataframe for storing punter results punter_df = pd.DataFrame() # loop through all punters for i in np.arange(punters): # simulate coin flips df = coin_flips(n,odds,bankroll,stake,bankrupt) # calculate net net = df['net'].sum() # check for bankruptcy bankruptcy = df['bankrupt'].sum() # append to our punter dataframe punter_df = punter_df.append({'odds':odds, 'net':net, 'bankrupt':bankruptcy},ignore_index=True) if plot: # plot the cumulative winnings over time df['cum_net'].plot(color=color,alpha=0.1) # check if punters ended up in profit punter_df['winning'] = np.where(punter_df['net']>0,1,0) return punter_df

We also want to modify the **many_coin_flips** function so that it’ll also take bankroll and stake size into consideration, counting up how many of our punters went bankrupt.

We won’t use the** compare_odds** function here, instead we’ll write a new one to compare stake sizing – but if we ever want to use it again sometime in the future a few minor changes will be needed here as well:

def compare_odds(punters=100,n=10000,odds=[1.97,2.00,2.03]): ''' Simulates and compare coin flip net winnings after 10000 flips for 3 groups of punters, betting at odds of 1.97, 2.00 and 2.03, respectively. Also plots every punters net winnings ''' # create figure and ax objects to plot on fig, ax = plt.subplots() # set y coordinates for annotating text for each group of punters ys = [0.25,0.5,0.75] # assign colors to each group of punters cs = ['r','y','g'] # loop through the groups of punters, with their respective odds, # chosen color and y for annotating text for odd, color, y in zip(odds,cs,ys): # run coin flip simulation with given odds, plot with chosen color df = many_coin_flips(punters,n,odd,color=color,plot=True) # calculate how many punters in the group ended up in profit winning_punters = df['winning'].mean() # set a text to annotate win_text = '%.2f: %.0f%%' %(odd,winning_punters * 100) # annotate odds and chance of profit for each group of punters ax.annotate(win_text,xy=(1.02,y), xycoords='axes fraction', color=color,va='center') # set title ax.set_title('Chances of ending up in profit after %s coin flips' %n) # set x and y axis labels ax.set_xlabel('Number of flips') ax.set_ylabel('Net profit') # add annotation 'legend' ax.annotate('odds: chance',xy=(1.02,1.0), xycoords=('axes fraction'),fontsize=10,va='center') # add horizontal line at breakeven point plt.axhline(color='k',alpha=0.5) # set y axis range at some nice number ax.set_ylim(-450,450) # show plot plt.show()

Now, with all our previous coin flip functions taking bankroll and stake size into consideration, we can go ahead and evaluate a few stake sizing strategies with a new function:

def compare_stakes(punters=200,n=10000,odds=2.03,stakes=[100,50,25,10,5,2,1,0.5],bankroll=100): ''' Similar to compare_odds, but here we instead want to compare different staking sizes for our coin flips betting at 2.03 odds Increased number of punters in each group, from 100 to 200 Also prints out the results ''' # pandas df to store results results_df = pd.DataFrame(columns=['stake','win','lose','bankrupt']) # colors to use in plot later, green=1=win, yellow=4=lost, red=2=bankrupt colors = [sns.color_palette()[i] for i in (1,4,2)] # loop through the groups of punters, with their respective odds for stake in stakes: # run coin flip simulation with given stake df = many_coin_flips(punters,n,odds,stake=stake,bankrupt=True) # calculate how many punters in the group ended up in profit winning_punters = df['winning'].mean() # ...and how many went bankrupt bankrupt_punters = df['bankrupt'].mean() # lost money but not bankrupt lose = 1 - winning_punters - bankrupt_punters # append to dataframe results_df = results_df.append({'stake':stake, 'win':winning_punters, 'lose':lose, 'bankrupt':bankrupt_punters},ignore_index=True) # set stake as index results_df.set_index('stake',inplace=True) # plot fig = plt.figure() # create ax object ax = results_df.plot(kind='bar',stacked=True,color=colors,alpha=0.8) # fix title, axis labels etc ax.set_title('Simulation results: betting %s coin flips at %s odds, starting bankroll %s' %(n,odds,bankroll)) ax.set_ylabel('%') # set legend outside plot ax.legend(bbox_to_anchor=(1.2,0.5)) # add percentage annotation for both win and bankrupt for x, w, l, b in zip(np.arange(len(results_df)),results_df['win'],results_df['lose'],results_df['bankrupt']): # calculate y coordinates win_y = w/2 lost_y = w + l/2 bankr_y = w + l + b/2 # annotate win, lose and bankrupt %, only if >=2% if w >= 0.04: ax.annotate('%.0f%%' %(w * 100),xy=(x,win_y),va='center',ha='center') if l >= 0.04: ax.annotate('%.0f%%' %(l * 100),xy=(x,lost_y),va='center',ha='center') if b >= 0.04: ax.annotate('%.0f%%' %(b * 100),xy=(x,bankr_y),va='center',ha='center') plt.show()

By default, our new **compare_stakes** function creates a number of punter groups, all betting on fair coin flips at 2.03 odds with a starting bankroll of a 100 units. For each group and their different staking plan, the function takes note of how many ended up in profit, how many lost and how many went bankrupt.

As we can see on the plot below, the results differ substantially:

**Just like last time, I want to remind you that any numbers here are only rough estimates, and increasing the size of each punter group as well as the number of coin flips will get us closer to the true values.**

So what can we learn from the above plot? Well, the main lesson is that even if you have a theoretically profitable bet, your edge will account for nearly nothing if you are too bold with your staking. Putting your whole bankroll at risk will see you go bankrupt around 96% of the time, and even if you bet as small as 2 units, you’ll still face a considerable risk of screwing up a lucrative proposition. The truth is that with such a small edge, keeping your bet small as well is the way to go if you want to make it in the long run.

But what if some fool offered us even higher odds, let’s say 2.20? First off, we would have to check if the person was A: mentally stable, and B: rich enough to pay us if (or rather, when) we win, before we go ahead and bet. Here our edge would be 10% (2.2 / 2.0 – 1), nearly 10 times as large as in the 2.03 situation, so we’ll likely be able to bet more – but how much? Well, the functions are written with this in mind, enabling us to play around with different situations and strategies. Specifying the **odds** parameter of our new function as 2.20, here’s what betting at a fair coin flip at 2.20 odds would look like:

As can be seen from the new plot, with a larger edge we can go ahead and raise our stake size considerably, hopefully boosting our winnings as well. So the main take-away from this small exercise is that even if you have an edge, if you want to make it in the long run you’ll have to be careful with your staking to avoid blowing up your bankroll – but also that the larger your edge, the larger you can afford to bet.

That’s it for now, but I’ll hopefully be back soon with a Part 2 about stake sizing, looking at a staking plan that actually takes your (perceived) edge into account when calculating the optimal stake size: The Kelly Criterion.

[…] spel ligger kvar på 600 :- per spel då jag efter att ha läst denna artikel, vill sänka mitt flatbet som procentsats av rullen. mellan 0,5-0,75 % av rullen ska mitt flatbet […]

LikeLike

[…] blog post is one of the half-done follow-ups to the staking post I did back in 2017. I wrote most of it at the same time as the original post but busy with work and […]

LikeLike